reCAPTCHA, not a bad choice

reCAPTCHA uses the human intelligence to help the world of OCR. People solve not one, but two captchas, one is the one computer knows the answer to, the other one computer does not know. So answer only one is good enough if you know which one to answer. The other one will assume to be true if one of the captcha's result is correct.

It provide both visual and voice captcha. The voice captcha should only show the user the captcha the computer already knew, because it is not possible for computer to create voice out of a word it don't understand.

There is always a chance that a person got one of the word right the other one wrong, reCAPTCHA have a build in system just to prevent this. After a word is "known", the system will then show the word to other people to confirm if it's right or not.
I'm definitely using it soon :)


Comments

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <img> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <span> <fn>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use [fn]...[/fn] (or <fn>...</fn>) to insert automatically numbered footnotes.
  • You can enable syntax highlighting of source code with the following tags: <code>, <blockcode>. The supported tag styles are: <foo>, [foo].
  • Mathematical equations and graphs can be added between [tex] and [/tex], [graph] and [/graph] tags.
  • Textual smileys will be replaced with graphical ones.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Honey Pot that kill bots