I'm participating in The Google Highly Open Participation Contest, I will work on Drupal because I'm one of it's users and it be nice if I can understand it's internal and work on it. Amazing for college essay xD.
This is a draft for my first task, Research Microformats and recommend ways they could be used in Drupal.
Microformats are a format based on the common XHTML. There are a few popular Microformats recommendation (I refuse to call it a standard) specifications, most notable are hCard, XFN, hCalendar and XOXO.
XFN are the most likely to be useful to Drupal(and the entire internet). Out going links are unavoidable part of every site, XFN is made to show the human to human relationship instead of content to content relationship of the out going link by adding rel="tag1 tag2 ... tagn".
I don't know if XFN can be extended, the background for XFN suggest there are a standard set of XFN rel tags [Friend, Acquaintance, Contact, Met, Co-worker, Colleague, Co-resident, Neighbor, Child, Parent, Sibling, Spouse, Kin, Muse, Crush, Date, Sweetheart, Me].
XFN is already used by Wordpress in it's blogroll, I believe it can also be used in the same way in Drupal for these few reasons:
1. In the future, search engines might recognize XFN and map out the relationship between 2 links. Thus construct a social map of related people's sites.
2. Superfluous introduction of links to the reader. For example
<a href="http://kuzew.net:81">My colleague and friend Kuzew's site</a>
can be changed to
<a href="http://kuzew.net:81" rel="friend met colleague co-resident">kuzew's site</a>
any small javascript pop up can show up the information in the rel tag when mouse over.
3. A possibility of a module that aggregate all the links posted on the site and use the XFN information for easy browsing.
4. Map out each user's relationship
Outgoing links: XFN does not need to be implemented in the core because there is no core module used for creating out going links; however, it's nice to use it for modules like Links or CCK. XFN can construct it's own taxonomy group, where each one of the possible descriptions are tags.
There are suggestions to implement XFN in the core. Users can tag other users with their relationship. It's really complicated. Different user have different relationship to the same person. XFN did not say it should be in one domain to refer to another, but one node refer to another, but search engines are stupid and get confused easily, it's likely the search engine assumes a site is owned by one person, and 2 user pages link to each other does not make sense to the bots [opinion, might not be true, but this did confused me and I believe I'm smarter than bots.]. Even if the search engines are smart, mapping out the relationship between users are costly, a new table have to be provided to do the relationship linking. I don't believe most Drupal users need a social map and genealogy, that feature is best used as a contribute module.
hCard is a microformats used to show profile of a person or a object.
1. hCard can be a extended part of each user's profile.
2. hCard as part of the site information
A uber basic hCard
<div id="hcard-Chao-Xu" class="vcard"> <span class="fn">Chao Xu</span> <div class="org">Mgccl's Blog</div> <div class="adr"> <div class="street-address">123 fake street</div> </div> </div>
hCard is contained inside a div, The div id starts with "hcard", follows by the full name of the user, use hyphens instead of space. The id is not required. the class for the DIV is vcard, it shows this is a hCard that follows the vCard, it's required so parsers understand this as a hCard.
Each node's in the hCard indicates what type of information it contains. for example, fn contain the full name.
Visit the wiki to see the full specification for hCard
The site information can be directly built into the core, adding a few more field to the original site information page and tweak the output.
The user hCard should be a extension to the profile module, create fields(first name, last name, etc) for profile module. Then it will render the hCards inside the user profile pages. Since it creates field inside the profile module, the information on the hCard can be searched though the site.
XOXO is a outline format(not hugs and kisses), intended for describe each node of a list and allow easy rendering. The extension of the outline are done by embed definition list inside each list item.
0. Lists are more meaningful and easily aggregated in the future.
1. Book module's Outline
2. Outline of the taxonomy
Books module's book outline and the chapter outline can be done with XOXO. Description, url and title are 3 of the properties useful for the outline. just adding the following for each node in the list is enough
List of the taxonomy can be another application of XOXO, description of each category or tag can be embedded with XOXO. Best implemented in the core
There are no other places in the core requires XOXO, users might write posts embed XOXO, but like all other XHTML, user should not depend on core Drupal providing tools for posting, but rather write himself, use a WYSIWYG editor support microformats, or get a contributed filter with this supported.
The family of rel attributes act as a simple description for links. The most famous one would be rel-nofollow, telling the search engine not to give the link any credit when ranking websites. rel-tag show the link as a tag, it has already implemented in Drupal 6. rel-license describe links connect to a license page.
1. rel-nofollow can fight spammers
2. rel-license provide information for bots
rel-nofollow should be part of the core for the comment module. and add a setting for global allow or disallow. Should be easy to add a rel="nofollow" condition(I assume... I don't know what handles external URLs...)
rel-license is not much useful for the core because most sites only link one license at the bottom of the page. but it should be implemented in the CCK, in case anyone uses CCK to create a download site, then each page can have a license field.
XFN, rel-nofollow, rel-license and rel-tag all embed themselves inside the rel attribute.
rel is a attribute for a collection of relationships of the linked document to the current one. They all describe the link in some way, XFN is different from the other ones. It describes the relationships between the owners of the documents instead of the document itself.
hCalendar is a format to explain a event in time.
Serve as a input/output format for event and calendar CCK, some softwares can interpret them.
<div class="vevent" id="hcalendar-Owning-noobs"> <a class="url" href="http://mgccl.com"> <abbr class="dtstart" title="2007-12-05">December 5th</abbr>, <abbr class="dtend" title="2007-12-06"> 2007</abbr> <span class="summary">Owning noobs</span>— at <span class="location">Long Island</span> </a> <div class="description">describe the event</div> <div class="tags">Tags: <a href="http://eventful.com/events/tags/PWNING">PWNING</a> <a href="http://eventful.com/events/tags/NOOB">NOOB</a> </div> </div>
The div class "vevent" defines this block uses hCalendar.
Like hCard, every container for the information are declared by it;s class attribute. All class attributes are obvious what it means. For the nodes contain time, the title attribute contains the ISO8601 time format. It's much easier for computer to read than "October 13th".
Clearly, it should work with Event module. Event module will add a page to import hCalendar into database, it can be separate and not depend on any Drupal scripts. Event's output on pages should also be hCalendar, that's all the changes the module should endure. The output are XHTML for each individual event page. Create a template and replace some variable would do.
Calender CCK could do the same.
Microformats parser could help with the parsing.
Some other microformats are in draft stage, it's not recommend for Drupal. hAtom is worth a mention, hAtom embed itself on normal XHTML, enables syndication. Personally I don't like that idea, it's better to create a separate Atom, saves bandwidth.
rel is not important enough for dedicated parameter in l(). l() are for internal links, the only internal link I found would use rel is the rel-tags. l() uses drupal_attributes() to add the attributes, adding a rel flag would be over kill.
The original post is in Chinese, I found it interesting enough to translate it.
The author, Fenng states 3 laws of the Great Firewall of China. GFW. If you know nothing about GFW, please read the article on wired.
First law of GFW: Site with User-generated content will be harmonized1
Second law of GFW: Any site got harmonized will have a cloned [and way worse] version in China [Benefiting people who have no imagination at making their own stuff].
Third law of GFW: The site does not get harmonized is never the most popular site in it's niche.
GFW have killed wikipedia, flickr and more. and it's influence is getting larger everyday. This have to be stopped. Everything the people in China see is what the government wants them to see. A lot of people still believe the country is in it's best shape. This can never be accomplished since most people in China don't have the balls to go against the government. It's understandable. Anyone who does so will not just danger himself, but everyone close to him.
Chinese stock market crashed this week, all my financial security... noooooo.
miniBench is part of OpenSourceMark, a open source benchmark project. Despite the sound of the name, its not platform independent(maybe the source code is cross platform). I have tried it in Windows and I don't know if the source will work without a OS.
miniBench mainly benchmark the CPU, but it also bench mark the I/O and memory.
miniBench's output is directly to the command line, so it's best if you use methods to capture the output to a file. Open command line and go to the directory containing minibench.exe, then type this
minibench>filename.txt
in command line, any program>filename will result writing the output to the a file. To append to the file, use >> instead of >.
and now, just wait. don't let the computer do any other process because it affects the accuracy of the benchmark.
Below is the Thinkpad T60 with a Core duo T2500 2GHz CPU and 1G ram. Faster CPUs have smaller elapsed time. The LCD looks strange doesn't it? Because once upon a time, alcohol was poured into it.
*** SUMMARY *** ===================================== Aes encrypt 8kB test 888.55 Aes decrypt 8kB test 701.85 Aes encrypt 16kB test 901.23 Aes decrypt 16kB test 703.75 Aes encrypt 32kB test 901.23 Aes decrypt 32kB test 701.85 Aes encrypt 64kB test 894.84 Aes decrypt 64kB test 701.85 Aes encrypt 128kB test 894.84 Aes decrypt 128kB test 701.85 Aes encrypt 256kB test 897.41 Aes decrypt 256kB test 701.31 Aes encrypt 512kB test 894.20 Aes decrypt 512kB test 701.18 Aes encrypt 1,024kB test 895.06 Aes decrypt 1,024kB test 701.81 Aes encrypt 2,048kB test 891.53 Aes decrypt 2,048kB test 699.77 Aes encrypt 4,096kB test 897.96 Aes decrypt 4,096kB test 704.82 Aes encrypt 8,192kB test 901.53 Aes decrypt 8,192kB test 704.82 Aes encrypt 16,384kB test 898.80 Aes decrypt 16,384kB test 705.61 Dhrystone test 1895.73 Double-precision floating-point arithmetic test 1061.05 Fib( 43 ) test 966.49 FFT test 747.44 FlopsFpuFloatAdd (MFLOPS) 324.08 FlopsSseFloatAdd (MFLOPS) 1624.37 FlopsFpuFloatMul (MFLOPS) 316.02 FlopsSseFloatMul (MFLOPS) 1600.00 FlopsFpuFloatDiv (MFLOPS) 61.80 FlopsSseFloatDiv (MFLOPS) 233.78 FlopsSseFloatMulAdd (MFLOPS) 2825.61 FlopsFpuDoubleAdd (MFLOPS) 839.45 FlopsSse2DoubleAdd (MFLOPS) 839.45 FlopsSse2DoubleAddMax (MFLOPS) 877.51 FlopsFpuDoubleMul (MFLOPS) 930.23 FlopsSse2DoubleMul (MFLOPS) 853.79 FlopsSse2DoubleMulMax (MFLOPS) 786.89 FlopsFpuDoubleDiv (MFLOPS) 64.08 FlopsSse2DoubleDiv (MFLOPS) 64.08 FlopsFpuDoubleMulAdd3 (MFLOPS) 1428.57 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd (MFLOPS) 1295.55 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd2 (MFLOPS) 1536.00 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd3 (MFLOPS) 1428.57 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd4 (MFLOPS) 1545.89 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd5 (MFLOPS) 1464.53 Heap sort test 725.93 Integer arithmetic test 887.82 Integer matrix multiplication test 695.05 Linpack (FLOPS DP Rolled) 1102.00 Linpack (FLOPS DP Unrolled) 1105.00 Pi test 857.37 Queen test 989.29 Sha-1 small strings score 972.97 Sha-1 50k string score 995.02 Sha-1 1,000,000 string score 998.64 Sha-1 10,000,000 score 995.02 Sha-1 overall score 1010.06 Sha-256 small strings score 1130.96 Sha-256 50k string score 1168.59 Sha-256 1,000,000 string score 1176.72 Sha-256 10,000,000 score 1173.69 Sha-256 overall score 1160.85 Sieve test 1070.96 String concatenation test 830.00 Transcendental floating-point function test 526.32 Whetstone test 1170.96 I/O test 24.90 Random Assignment test (MB/s) 40.21 Stream copy bandwidth (MB/s) 2123.91 Stream scale bandwidth (MB/s) 2101.02 Stream add bandwidth (MB/s) 2334.82 Stream triad bandwidth (MB/s) 2334.95 Memory Bandwidth Integer Read test (MB/s) 2414.73 Memory Bandwidth Integer Read Reverse test (MB/s) 2285.71 Memory Bandwidth Integer Read BP64 test (MB/s) 3977.53 Memory Bandwidth Integer Read PREFETCHNTA test (MB/s) 4330.72 Memory Bandwidth Integer Write test (MB/s) 1889.47 Memory Bandwidth Integer Write Unroll test (MB/s) 1260.31 Memory Bandwidth Integer Copy test (MB/s) 2197.50 Memory Bandwidth Integer Add test (MB/s) 2370.37 Memory Bandwidth Integer Scale test (MB/s) 2085.51 Memory Bandwidth Integer Triad test (MB/s) 2359.65 Memory Bandwidth Integer Copy BP64 test (MB/s) 1740.19 Memory Bandwidth Double Read test (MB/s) 3250.71 Memory Bandwidth Double Read Reverse test (MB/s) 2909.09 Memory Bandwidth Double Write test (MB/s) 1314.49 Memory Bandwidth Double Copy test (MB/s) 2204.46 Memory Bandwidth memcpy test (MB/s) 2098.36 ===================================== ===================================== Total elapsed time: 594.67 s.
For the other computer, Dell Inspiron 1200 with Celeron M 1.4GHz and 256MB memory, it's way much poorer result.
*** SUMMARY *** ===================================== Aes encrypt 8kB test 596.52 Aes decrypt 8kB test 486.51 Aes encrypt 16kB test 626.39 Aes decrypt 16kB test 489.37 Aes encrypt 32kB test 624.89 Aes decrypt 32kB test 490.35 Aes encrypt 64kB test 624.79 Aes decrypt 64kB test 490.29 Aes encrypt 128kB test 624.89 Aes decrypt 128kB test 489.37 Aes encrypt 256kB test 596.85 Aes decrypt 256kB test 488.86 Aes encrypt 512kB test 624.83 Aes decrypt 512kB test 488.92 Aes encrypt 1,024kB test 620.79 Aes decrypt 1,024kB test 487.11 Aes encrypt 2,048kB test 620.79 Aes decrypt 2,048kB test 487.17 Aes encrypt 4,096kB test 625.27 Aes decrypt 4,096kB test 470.79 Aes encrypt 8,192kB test 625.27 Aes decrypt 8,192kB test 489.63 Aes encrypt 16,384kB test 624.57 Aes decrypt 16,384kB test 491.07 Dhrystone test 1280.00 Double-precision floating-point arithmetic test 734.10 Fib( 43 ) test 658.63 FFT test 361.28 FlopsFpuFloatAdd (MFLOPS) 208.96 FlopsSseFloatAdd (MFLOPS) 868.15 FlopsFpuFloatMul (MFLOPS) 206.45 FlopsSseFloatMul (MFLOPS) 890.37 FlopsFpuFloatDiv (MFLOPS) 41.51 FlopsSseFloatDiv (MFLOPS) 162.29 FlopsSseFloatMulAdd (MFLOPS) 1863.17 FlopsFpuDoubleAdd (MFLOPS) 453.00 FlopsSse2DoubleAdd (MFLOPS) 492.31 FlopsSse2DoubleAddMax (MFLOPS) 602.26 FlopsFpuDoubleMul (MFLOPS) 445.19 FlopsSse2DoubleMul (MFLOPS) 457.14 FlopsSse2DoubleMulMax (MFLOPS) 495.87 FlopsFpuDoubleDiv (MFLOPS) 43.84 FlopsSse2DoubleDiv (MFLOPS) 44.52 FlopsFpuDoubleMulAdd3 (MFLOPS) 690.15 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd (MFLOPS) 711.11 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd2 (MFLOPS) 1041.21 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd3 (MFLOPS) 975.61 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd4 (MFLOPS) 1050.04 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd5 (MFLOPS) 952.38 Heap sort test 413.71 Integer arithmetic test 459.98 Integer matrix multiplication test 506.86 Linpack (FLOPS DP Rolled) 567.00 Linpack (FLOPS DP Unrolled) 559.00 Pi test 590.96 Queen test 687.82 Sha-1 small strings score 674.46 Sha-1 50k string score 695.32 Sha-1 1,000,000 string score 688.47 Sha-1 10,000,000 score 656.42 Sha-1 overall score 692.07 Sha-256 small strings score 785.62 Sha-256 50k string score 802.67 Sha-256 1,000,000 string score 815.67 Sha-256 10,000,000 score 815.86 Sha-256 overall score 804.27 Sieve test 725.45 String concatenation test 33.59 Transcendental floating-point function test 399.07 Whetstone test 813.45 I/O test 16.93 Random Assignment test (MB/s) 24.07 Stream copy bandwidth (MB/s) 983.69 Stream scale bandwidth (MB/s) 1036.84 Stream add bandwidth (MB/s) 1199.33 Stream triad bandwidth (MB/s) 1200.60 Memory Bandwidth Integer Read test (MB/s) 1510.29 Memory Bandwidth Integer Read Reverse test (MB/s) 1497.01 Memory Bandwidth Integer Read BP64 test (MB/s) 2164.80 Memory Bandwidth Integer Read PREFETCHNTA test (MB/s) 2200.00 Memory Bandwidth Integer Write test (MB/s) 1004.02 Memory Bandwidth Integer Write Unroll test (MB/s) 619.91 Memory Bandwidth Integer Copy test (MB/s) 1065.53 Memory Bandwidth Integer Add test (MB/s) 1179.71 Memory Bandwidth Integer Scale test (MB/s) 998.07 Memory Bandwidth Integer Triad test (MB/s) 1157.52 Memory Bandwidth Integer Copy BP64 test (MB/s) 854.89 Memory Bandwidth Double Read test (MB/s) 1793.52 Memory Bandwidth Double Read Reverse test (MB/s) 1799.57 Memory Bandwidth Double Write test (MB/s) 585.48 Memory Bandwidth Double Copy test (MB/s) 1076.75 Memory Bandwidth memcpy test (MB/s) 1006.86 ===================================== ===================================== Total elapsed time: 904.39 s.
My sister's laptop
=== miniBench benchmark version 1.0===
*** SUMMARY ***
=====================================
Aes encrypt 8kB test 491.15
Aes decrypt 8kB test 469.98
Aes encrypt 16kB test 478.01
Aes decrypt 16kB test 442.62
Aes encrypt 32kB test 488.21
Aes decrypt 32kB test 448.14
Aes encrypt 64kB test 462.21
Aes decrypt 64kB test 448.14
Aes encrypt 128kB test 414.10
Aes decrypt 128kB test 461.34
Aes encrypt 256kB test 481.84
Aes decrypt 256kB test 470.50
Aes encrypt 512kB test 484.76
Aes decrypt 512kB test 480.91
Aes encrypt 1,024kB test 477.88
Aes decrypt 1,024kB test 472.93
Aes encrypt 2,048kB test 467.24
Aes decrypt 2,048kB test 452.64
Aes encrypt 4,096kB test 468.73
Aes decrypt 4,096kB test 481.33
Aes encrypt 8,192kB test 475.41
Aes decrypt 8,192kB test 484.28
Aes encrypt 16,384kB test 481.55
Aes decrypt 16,384kB test 479.34
Dhrystone test 1603.21
Double-precision floating-point arithmetic test 1159.57
Fib( 43 ) test 1333.60
FFT test 538.92
FlopsFpuFloatAdd (MFLOPS) 185.46
FlopsSseFloatAdd (MFLOPS) 453.77
FlopsFpuFloatMul (MFLOPS) 171.80
FlopsSseFloatMul (MFLOPS) 287.30
FlopsFpuFloatDiv (MFLOPS) 78.00
FlopsSseFloatDiv (MFLOPS) 193.14
FlopsSseFloatMulAdd (MFLOPS) 2485.44
FlopsFpuDoubleAdd (MFLOPS) 379.87
FlopsSse2DoubleAdd (MFLOPS) 236.34
FlopsSse2DoubleAddMax (MFLOPS) 279.72
FlopsFpuDoubleMul (MFLOPS) 371.57
FlopsSse2DoubleMul (MFLOPS) 214.53
FlopsSse2DoubleMulMax (MFLOPS) 389.61
FlopsFpuDoubleDiv (MFLOPS) 82.31
FlopsSse2DoubleDiv (MFLOPS) 95.32
FlopsFpuDoubleMulAdd3 (MFLOPS) 810.13
FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd (MFLOPS) 505.21
FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd2 (MFLOPS) 759.49
FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd3 (MFLOPS) 707.44
FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd4 (MFLOPS) 488.36
FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd5 (MFLOPS) 1412.80
Heap sort test 549.20
Integer arithmetic test 360.28
Integer matrix multiplication test 387.53
Linpack (FLOPS DP Rolled) 827.00
Linpack (FLOPS DP Unrolled) 813.00
Pi test 456.84
Queen test 967.82
Sha-1 small strings score 814.92
Sha-1 50k string score 839.37
Sha-1 1,000,000 string score 824.74
Sha-1 10,000,000 score 832.07
Sha-1 overall score 844.27
Sha-256 small strings score 1160.68
Sha-256 50k string score 1238.79
Sha-256 1,000,000 string score 1235.87
Sha-256 10,000,000 score 1232.60
Sha-256 overall score 1216.92
Sieve test 890.98
String concatenation test 581.44
Transcendental floating-point function test 547.34
Whetstone test 1194.74
I/O test 87.18
Random Assignment test (MB/s) 27.79
Stream copy bandwidth (MB/s) 2083.04
Stream scale bandwidth (MB/s) 1974.68
Stream add bandwidth (MB/s) 1535.04
Stream triad bandwidth (MB/s) 1569.99
Memory Bandwidth Integer Read test (MB/s) 1721.17
Memory Bandwidth Integer Read Reverse test (MB/s) 1692.41
Memory Bandwidth Integer Read BP64 test (MB/s) 3072.75
Memory Bandwidth Integer Read PREFETCHNTA test (MB/s) 2861.05
Memory Bandwidth Integer Write test (MB/s) 1544.70
Memory Bandwidth Integer Write Unroll test (MB/s) 1563.00
Memory Bandwidth Integer Copy test (MB/s) 2026.86
Memory Bandwidth Integer Add test (MB/s) 2051.28
Memory Bandwidth Integer Scale test (MB/s) 1976.28
Memory Bandwidth Integer Triad test (MB/s) 2051.28
Memory Bandwidth Integer Copy BP64 test (MB/s) 1927.53
Memory Bandwidth Double Read test (MB/s) 2039.26
Memory Bandwidth Double Read Reverse test (MB/s) 2039.00
Memory Bandwidth Double Write test (MB/s) 1231.34
Memory Bandwidth Double Copy test (MB/s) 2097.40
Memory Bandwidth memcpy test (MB/s) 2011.06
=====================================
=====================================
Total elapsed time: 712.45 s.EEEPC 1000HA
*** SUMMARY *** ===================================== Aes encrypt 8kB test 258.84 Aes decrypt 8kB test 243.25 Aes encrypt 16kB test 261.00 Aes decrypt 16kB test 242.79 Aes encrypt 32kB test 259.10 Aes decrypt 32kB test 243.50 Aes encrypt 64kB test 259.37 Aes decrypt 64kB test 241.62 Aes encrypt 128kB test 258.84 Aes decrypt 128kB test 243.50 Aes encrypt 256kB test 261.45 Aes decrypt 256kB test 242.47 Aes encrypt 512kB test 259.48 Aes decrypt 512kB test 241.99 Aes encrypt 1,024kB test 259.76 Aes decrypt 1,024kB test 241.53 Aes encrypt 2,048kB test 260.04 Aes decrypt 2,048kB test 241.55 Aes encrypt 4,096kB test 261.31 Aes decrypt 4,096kB test 243.03 Aes encrypt 8,192kB test 262.80 Aes decrypt 8,192kB test 243.78 Aes encrypt 16,384kB test 262.69 Aes decrypt 16,384kB test 244.37 Dhrystone test 919.54 Double-precision floating-point arithmetic test 415.86 Fib( 43 ) test 814.55 FFT test 375.18 FlopsFpuFloatAdd (MFLOPS) 65.72 FlopsSseFloatAdd (MFLOPS) 502.04 FlopsFpuFloatMul (MFLOPS) 65.22 FlopsSseFloatMul (MFLOPS) 499.53 FlopsFpuFloatDiv (MFLOPS) 20.81 FlopsSseFloatDiv (MFLOPS) 93.34 FlopsSseFloatMulAdd (MFLOPS) 1050.90 FlopsFpuDoubleAdd (MFLOPS) 198.46 FlopsSse2DoubleAdd (MFLOPS) 248.52 FlopsSse2DoubleAddMax (MFLOPS) 307.30 FlopsFpuDoubleMul (MFLOPS) 197.73 FlopsSse2DoubleMul (MFLOPS) 208.12 FlopsSse2DoubleMulMax (MFLOPS) 210.43 FlopsFpuDoubleDiv (MFLOPS) 26.53 FlopsSse2DoubleDiv (MFLOPS) 26.10 FlopsFpuDoubleMulAdd3 (MFLOPS) 249.74 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd (MFLOPS) 303.84 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd2 (MFLOPS) 401.67 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd3 (MFLOPS) 361.31 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd4 (MFLOPS) 369.09 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd5 (MFLOPS) 344.09 Heap sort test 326.67 Integer arithmetic test 238.60 Integer matrix multiplication test 184.83 Linpack (FLOPS DP Rolled) 214.00 Linpack (FLOPS DP Unrolled) 214.00 Pi test 281.71 Queen test 763.93 Sha-1 small strings score 354.67 Sha-1 50k string score 352.90 Sha-1 1,000,000 string score 323.32 Sha-1 10,000,000 score 355.56 Sha-1 overall score 353.01 Sha-256 small strings score 588.75 Sha-256 50k string score 615.49 Sha-256 1,000,000 string score 610.63 Sha-256 10,000,000 score 617.40 Sha-256 overall score 608.19 Sieve test 585.30 String concatenation test 366.37 Transcendental floating-point function test 256.47 Whetstone test 514.76 I/O test 32.97 Random Assignment test (MB/s) 17.18 Stream copy bandwidth (MB/s) 1793.03 Stream scale bandwidth (MB/s) 1718.53 Stream add bandwidth (MB/s) 2036.58 Stream triad bandwidth (MB/s) 1788.61 Memory Bandwidth Integer Read test (MB/s) 1391.30 Memory Bandwidth Integer Read Reverse test (MB/s) 1322.97 Memory Bandwidth Integer Read BP64 test (MB/s) 2657.15 Memory Bandwidth Integer Read PREFETCHNTA test (MB/s) 3508.41 Memory Bandwidth Integer Write test (MB/s) 1251.76 Memory Bandwidth Integer Write Unroll test (MB/s) 1200.95 Memory Bandwidth Integer Copy test (MB/s) 1903.18 Memory Bandwidth Integer Add test (MB/s) 2232.56 Memory Bandwidth Integer Scale test (MB/s) 1759.40 Memory Bandwidth Integer Triad test (MB/s) 1794.39 Memory Bandwidth Integer Copy BP64 test (MB/s) 1376.54 Memory Bandwidth Double Read test (MB/s) 2443.87 Memory Bandwidth Double Read Reverse test (MB/s) 2076.84 Memory Bandwidth Double Write test (MB/s) 1188.00 Memory Bandwidth Double Copy test (MB/s) 1912.27 Memory Bandwidth memcpy test (MB/s) 1924.93 ===================================== ===================================== Total elapsed time: 1161.69 s. CLOCKS_PER_SEC: 1000
Aunt's new laptop
*** SUMMARY *** ===================================== Aes encrypt 8kB test 610.75 Aes decrypt 8kB test 609.61 Aes encrypt 16kB test 612.38 Aes decrypt 16kB test 610.47 Aes encrypt 32kB test 613.15 Aes decrypt 32kB test 610.47 Aes encrypt 64kB test 608.67 Aes decrypt 64kB test 606.97 Aes encrypt 128kB test 599.26 Aes decrypt 128kB test 602.11 Aes encrypt 256kB test 597.32 Aes decrypt 256kB test 600.47 Aes encrypt 512kB test 591.12 Aes decrypt 512kB test 597.51 Aes encrypt 1,024kB test 593.62 Aes decrypt 1,024kB test 593.42 Aes encrypt 2,048kB test 593.23 Aes decrypt 2,048kB test 593.71 Aes encrypt 4,096kB test 599.18 Aes decrypt 4,096kB test 600.07 Aes encrypt 8,192kB test 597.90 Aes decrypt 8,192kB test 600.27 Aes encrypt 16,384kB test 597.98 Aes decrypt 16,384kB test 601.65 Dhrystone test 2025.32 Double-precision floating-point arithmetic test 1495.98 Fib( 43 ) test 1189.80 FFT test 625.51 FlopsFpuFloatAdd (MFLOPS) 232.05 FlopsSseFloatAdd (MFLOPS) 663.90 FlopsFpuFloatMul (MFLOPS) 224.94 FlopsSseFloatMul (MFLOPS) 668.62 FlopsFpuFloatDiv (MFLOPS) 106.50 FlopsSseFloatDiv (MFLOPS) 276.63 FlopsSseFloatMulAdd (MFLOPS) 3298.97 FlopsFpuDoubleAdd (MFLOPS) 502.83 FlopsSse2DoubleAdd (MFLOPS) 339.85 FlopsSse2DoubleAddMax (MFLOPS) 560.09 FlopsFpuDoubleMul (MFLOPS) 500.94 FlopsSse2DoubleMul (MFLOPS) 347.83 FlopsSse2DoubleMulMax (MFLOPS) 558.14 FlopsFpuDoubleDiv (MFLOPS) 118.87 FlopsSse2DoubleDiv (MFLOPS) 121.93 FlopsFpuDoubleMulAdd3 (MFLOPS) 1191.07 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd (MFLOPS) 698.69 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd2 (MFLOPS) 1140.14 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd3 (MFLOPS) 1102.18 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd4 (MFLOPS) 886.43 FlopsSse2DoubleMulAdd5 (MFLOPS) 1833.81 Heap sort test 708.71 Integer arithmetic test 464.95 Integer matrix multiplication test 455.93 Linpack (FLOPS DP Rolled) 1021.00 Linpack (FLOPS DP Unrolled) 1002.00 Pi test 561.89 Queen test 1204.59 Sha-1 small strings score 995.80 Sha-1 50k string score 1033.83 Sha-1 1,000,000 string score 1012.89 Sha-1 10,000,000 score 1015.70 Sha-1 overall score 1034.58 Sha-256 small strings score 1452.84 Sha-256 50k string score 1535.19 Sha-256 1,000,000 string score 1524.21 Sha-256 10,000,000 score 1525.00 Sha-256 overall score 1508.39 Sieve test 1108.61 String concatenation test 728.39 Transcendental floating-point function test 692.67 Whetstone test 1500.00 I/O test 84.58 Random Assignment test (MB/s) 29.15 Stream copy bandwidth (MB/s) 2341.10 Stream scale bandwidth (MB/s) 2317.80 Stream add bandwidth (MB/s) 1901.83 Stream triad bandwidth (MB/s) 1954.70 Memory Bandwidth Integer Read test (MB/s) 1786.51 Memory Bandwidth Integer Read Reverse test (MB/s) 1726.37 Memory Bandwidth Integer Read BP64 test (MB/s) 3426.72 Memory Bandwidth Integer Read PREFETCHNTA test (MB/s) 3252.66 Memory Bandwidth Integer Write test (MB/s) 1805.87 Memory Bandwidth Integer Write Unroll test (MB/s) 1804.78 Memory Bandwidth Integer Copy test (MB/s) 2437.54 Memory Bandwidth Integer Add test (MB/s) 2543.45 Memory Bandwidth Integer Scale test (MB/s) 2407.10 Memory Bandwidth Integer Triad test (MB/s) 2549.67 Memory Bandwidth Integer Copy BP64 test (MB/s) 2686.50 Memory Bandwidth Double Read test (MB/s) 2215.76 Memory Bandwidth Double Read Reverse test (MB/s) 2160.99 Memory Bandwidth Double Write test (MB/s) 1676.45 Memory Bandwidth Double Copy test (MB/s) 2433.83 Memory Bandwidth memcpy test (MB/s) 2443.12 ===================================== ===================================== Total elapsed time: 587.28 s. CLOCKS_PER_SEC: 1000
Only apply to Windows XP[Maybe Vista too but I can't be bothered to check].
I personally prefer MP3 because it's the more widely supported format for audio than WMA.
Yeah, I just got a computer my mom removed from me 2 years ago, it have a 40GB hard disk, with loads of crap on it, my music is 4GB. For old computers like this, the smaller the music file is better.
WMA is the best choice for the windows system, it's about half the size of MP3s but still maintain the same quality. But I did not find any free software to convert MP3 to WMA, Google search is filled with commercial crap. I have to give those webmasters credit for making crap in the first thousand results.
So after some search for the alternative, I found the exact program for the job. Who could be better at making softwares for WMA than Microsoft? After all, it's Windows Media Audio.
I'm not talking about burn MP3 to CDs and then use Windows Media player to rip it into WMA. It show good problem solving skill but it's also plain stupid.
There is a bonus pack for Windows Media Player released by Microsoft. The package is 18 MB and you only need the one program in it, MP3 Audio Converter LE.
I made a zip file of the "useful part"[1 MB], see the attachment of this post. I never tested without installation. Please be my tester. 
idk if this is legal or not... but w/e, I will put it up here until Microsoft ask me to remove it.
If you want to download the 18MB version [or just because mine stripped down version does not work], get it from this link.
Sites devoted about sharing contests, like My Blog Contest and The Prize Blog, features more and more blog contests.
The usual blog contests features these few requirements:
1. Blog about the contest with specific anchor text
2. Blog about the blog holding the contest with specific anchor text
3. Comment or use some other form of communication to let the contest creator know
Usually, a blog contest means:
1. More visitors
2. Better ranking in search engines for some specific keywords
3. Some visitors might subscribe to the blog
A huge amount of benefit can be brought of the contest starter.
How about the contestants?
How about the Internet?
The contestants spend one post just to describe a contest to gain a small chance in winning some small price. If the post is unrelated to their blog, some readers of the contestant's blog will not be happy.
The Internet is created for information1. The blog contests is a way to play with the search engine. Contests are bribing bloggers to review their blog, like PayPerPost. Even a small blog with no much potential in some keyword but with high incentive prize, it can be increased in search engine rank. Thus the readers will read some poor quality blog because the blog paid some money for it.
PayPerPost users got punished by Google. Google will figure out a way of attack blog contests.
Recent comments
6 days 8 hours ago
1 week 3 days ago
1 week 5 days ago
2 weeks 19 hours ago
2 weeks 20 hours ago
2 weeks 21 hours ago
2 weeks 1 day ago
2 weeks 2 days ago
2 weeks 5 days ago
2 weeks 5 days ago